据留学360介绍，GMAT考试中作文是每个考生都会花大量的时间复习准备的，在每天的准备过程中我们也逐渐发现了GMAT作文高分的一些规律。这些规律是共享的，也就是说我们在GMAT写作中基本都能用得到，经过总结我们发现了一些在作文考试过程中常用的思路和技巧，掌握这些知识能很快提升我们的作文成绩。
1、提高GMAT作文水平，首先要分析原因
原因上的问题，有以下三个：
可疑调查
样本不足
结论无据
2、提高GMAT作文水平，也离不开分析结果
结论上的问题，有以下两个：
无因果联系
二者择一
3、提高GMAT作文水平更需要论证上的分析
就是论证过程上的问题，有以下两个，纵向横向各一个：
错误类比(横向)
时地全等(纵向)
这样，只要记住了三字诀：因、果、证，就很容易记牢全部GMAT作文的问题了。为了进一步夯实GMAT作文的记忆方法，我们下面讲解一篇案例
下面是往期的一篇GMAT作文：
“Our total sales have increased this year by 20 percent since we added a pharmacy section to our grocery store. Clearly, the customer’s main concern is the convenience afforded by one-stop shopping. // 无因果联系，可能另有他因。 The surest way to increase our profits over the next couple of years, therefore, is to add a clothing department along with an automotive supplies and repair shop. We should also plan to continue adding new departments and services, such as a restaurant and a garden shop, in subsequent years. // 时地全等 Being the only store in the area that offers such a range of services will give us a competitive advantage over other local stores.” // 结论无据
掌握了GMAT作文问题的三个方面，提高GMAT作文水平也会变得很容易，我们要在大量的实战中，不断地总结GMAT作文的经验，加以分析总结，增强GMAT作文记忆方法。
以上就是小编整理的GMAT考试关于作文思路的介绍，通过以上的有关GMAT作文的介绍我们会发现经常使用的作文思路有哪些。考生们在准备GMAT写作的时候可以拿来使用，这些对于作文成绩提升来说都是行之有效的方法，希望大家在准备过程中多注意。
原创GMAT考试作文范文与评价赏析关于GMAT考试的作文部分，我们前面告诉大家作文是如何来给大家打分的。这些标准也是每一个考GMAT的考生应该关注的地方，其实在GMAT写作过程中我们还需要注意到的就是考官们是如何去点评一篇文章的，如何从这些人的角度出发去分析一篇文章：
原题：
The following appeared as part of an annual report sent to stockholders by Olympic Foods, a processor of frozen foods:
“Over time, the costs of processing go down because as organizations learn how to do things better, they become more efficient. In color film processing, for example, the cost of a 3-by-5-inch print fell from 50 cents for five-day service in 1970 to 20 cents for one-day service in 1984. The same principle applies to the processing of food. And since Olympic Foods will soon celebrate its 25th birthday, we can expect that our long experience will enable us to minimize costs and thus maximize profits.”
逻辑漏洞：
1. false analogy: The food industry is not analogous to the color film industry.
2.causal oversimplification: Other factors that may contribute t to the cost decline of the printing cost should be considered and ruled out.
3.gratuitous assumption: The conclusion of the argument is based on a gratuitous assumption that the company can minimize cost and maximize profit because the company has been conducted for 25 years.
范文：
The author assumes that since organizations engaged in color-film processing were able to increase efficiency and cut-down costs over a period of 25 years; same must be true of Olympic Foods, which is about to celebrate its 25th anniversary. The arguments is based on questionable assumptions and weak analogies and appears to be a result of a hasty generalization.
The main problem with the author’s reasoning is the weak analogy he develops between the two “processing” industries. One fails to see any logical connection between the two and the author makes no effort to show the connection either. The two industries are too dissimilar to be compared. For example: frozen food industry faces problem of storage, transportation, contamination etc; no similar problems are observed in the film-processing industry. Even the markets for the two differ widely. The argument could have been strong if the author could show the missing connection or if he had compared the frozen-food industry with a similar industry.
Also the author fails to recognize that it’s not the number of years of experience that matters; what actually matters is what is learnt over all those years.
An industry may mature over a couple of years, yet another may remain stagnant even after 25 years. The color-film industry people may have tremendous learnings that may have contributed to the cost-reduction; but the report shows no evidence of Olympic Foods doing the same.
Another point that the author misses completely is that there may be factors other than just the expertise and experience gained over the mentioned period. For example: developments in technology may have resulted in the cost-reduction for the color-film processing industry. The author could have strengthened his stand by showing that it’s merely the increased efficiency that has brought costs down. He could have also chosen to highlight similar developments in the food-processing industry too.
To sum, the author’s conclusion doesn’t appear to be convincing at all. The author could have made it a bit persuasive by presenting the evidence mentioned above. Without these, the argument is weak and fails to impress the reader.
编辑为大家整理了GMAT考试中点评范文的相关内容，考生们在准备考GMAT的时候需要从判卷者的角度出发去给自己的作文打分。这样我们就能在以后的备考过程中有意识的避开这些错误，也就有利于提升我们的GMAT写作成绩了，祝大家考试取得理想的成绩。
